Utilizing Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) with mobile Learning to Enhance Students' Reading Comprehension

Nirwanto Maruf, A. Maya Rupa Anjely


This present study aims to find out the how significant the utilization of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) with mobile learning on students’ reading comprehension. This study is conducted by using the quantitative method with pre-experimental design.  The instrument used in in this study was test sheet called as Reading Comprehension Test (RCT), and it employed in pre-test and post-test, it was developed and selected from student textbooks, story books, and authentic materials to measure students’ reading comprehension achievement. The present results reveal that CIRC teaching strategy with mobile learning (m-learning) improved students’ performance in reading comprehension, it was indicated from the result of paired samples test (t-test) that the value of the t-observed significant is at .000 is lower than .050 (.000 < .050, this means students’ improvement is significant after exposed by the experimentation (treatment) process. Based on the result, it concluded that the utilization of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) with mobile learning as teaching strategy can enhance students’ reading comprehension.

Keywords: Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC), Mobile Learning, Reading Comprehension.

Full Text:



Afflerbach, P.P.,& Choa, B. 2011. The classroom assessment of reading. In M.L. Kamil, P.D. Person, E.B.Moje, & P.P.Afflerbach’ (Eds.) Handbook of Reading Research, V, IV. New York: Routledge.

Atkins, J. 2010. “Creating Collaboration”. English Journal, 99(5), 12-13

Chen, C.-H., Chen, S.-H., Hwang, G.-J., & Yang, T.-C. 2010. “Factors influencing teachers’ adoption of a ubiquitous technology application in supporting teacher performance”. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, Volume 4, Number 1, 39-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2010.029953.

Crampton, A., Ragusa, A. T., & Cavanagh, H. 2012. “Cross discipline investigation of the relationship between academic performance and online resource access by distance education students”. Research in Learning Technology. Volume 20, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14430.

Creswell, J. W. 2008. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Gupta, M., & Ahuja, J. 2014. “Cooperative Integrated Reading Composition (CIRC): Impact on Reading Comprehension Achievement in English Among Seventh Graders”. IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature (IMPACT: IJRHAL), 2(5), 37–46. Retrieved from http://www.impactjournals.us/journals. php?id=11&jtype=2&page=8

Johnson, D., & Johnson, F. 2009. Joining together: Group theory and group skills (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Education.

Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. 1999. Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. USA: Allyn and Bacon.

Koole, M., Mc.Quilkin, J.L., Ally, M. 2010. “Mobile Learning in Distance Education: Utility or Futility”. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education 24 (2).

Schuler, C., Winters, N., & West, M. 2012. The future of mobile learning: Implications for policy makers and planners. Paris: UNESCO.

Slavin, R.E.1994. Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. 2nd Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Sulisworo, D., & Suryani, F. 2014. “The Effect of Cooperative Learning, Motivation and Information Technology Literacy to Achievement”. International Journal of Learning & Development, Vol. 4, No. 2, 58-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v4i2.4908.

Tal, H. M., & Gross, M. 2014. “Teaching Sustainability via Smartphone Enhanced Experiential Learning in a Botanical Garden”. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technology, Vol. 8, Issue 1, 10-15.

Zarei, A. A., & Keshavarz, J. 2011. “On the Effects of Two Models of Cooperative Learning on EFL Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary”. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 1(2), 38–54.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31314/british.9.2.10-19.2020

Article metrics

Abstract views : 144 | views : 108


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Publisher : Program Studi S1 Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo