Model Direct Instruction on Service and Service Understanding in Badminton Game

Boby Agustan

doi:10.31314/gss.v1i1.913

Model Direct Instruction on Service and Service Understanding in Badminton Game

Boby Agustan

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of the direct instruction model on serviceability in badminton games. This research is a mixed method. The population in this study were VIII grade students at SMP Negeri 3 Sindangwangi Majalengka totaling 93 students. The sampling technique used was random sampling so that the study sample was obtained, namely students of class VIII.B, which amounted to 28 students. The research instruments used in this study were service tests and interviews about understanding service. The data analysis technique in this study is the normality test, and the hypothesis test is used to determine the effect of the direct instruction model on serviceability in badminton games. Based on statistical calculations for service tests obtained by Z Hit (4.59)> Z daf (2.35), the Hi received means the influence of the direct instruction model on serviceability in badminton games at a level of confidence (α) of 0.05. As for understanding service excellence, as you know, service excellence is the first attack to get points. This study concludes that there is an influence of the direct instruction model on service in badminton games. The finding is that the direct instruction model still has that is all teacher-centered instruction.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abduljabar, B. (2011). Pengertian pendidikan jasmani. Ilmu Pendidikan, 1991.

Ardyanto, S. (2018). Peningkatan Teknik Servis Pendek Pada Bulutangkis Melalui Media Audio Visual. Jurnal Ilmiah Penjas, 4(3).

Arganata, M. A. (2016). Kekalahan Pemain Bulutangkis Ganda Putra Indonesia Dari Pemain Ganda Putra Korea. Jurnal Kesehatan Olahraga, 06(2).

Cothran, D. J., & Kulinna, P. H. (2006). Students’ perspectives on direct, peer, and inquiry teaching strategies. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.25.2.166

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2017). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGrawHill, 91.

Gazali, N., & Cendra, R. (2018). Badminton Long-serve Skill’s Level of Physical Ed-ucation Male Students in the Universitas Islam Riau. Active: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreations.

Jumhana, & Agustan, B. (2016). Pengaruh Model Directinstruction terhadap Teknik Dasar Dribbling dalam Permainan Sepak Bola. JUARA : Jurnal Olahraga, 1(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33222/juara.v1i1.57

Ramadan, G., & Juniarti, Y. (2020) Metode penelitian: pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. CV Sadari Press

Rymarz, R. M. (2013). Direct instruction as a pedagogical tool in religious education. British Journal of Religious Education, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2013.781992

Shibinski, K., & Martin, M. (2003). Using directed instruction to teach initial psychomotor-skill acquisition. In Athletic Therapy Today (Vol. 8, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1123/att.8.2.34

Subarjah, H. (2010). Hasil Belajar Keterampilan Bermain Bulutangkis Studi Eksperimen pada Siswa Diklat Bulutangkis FPOK-UPI. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.361

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta.

Suherman, A. (2016). The Analysis of Character Education in Teaching Physical Education. https://doi.org/10.2991/icieve-15.2016.50

van der Graaf, J., van de Sande, E., Gijsel, M., & Segers, E. (2019). A combined approach to strengthen children’s scientific thinking: direct instruction on scientific reasoning and training of teacher’s verbal support. International Journal of Science Education, 41(9). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1594442

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31314/gss.v1i1.913