ANALISIS YURIDIS URGENSI PENERAPAN ASAS KESEIMBANGAN DALAM SYARAT PERMOHONAN PAILIT

 M. Ali Husaen Mubaroq

Abstract


The balance of legal protection for creditors and debtors is one of the principles of bankruptcy law in Indonesia. In this work, the author focused on research regarding the urgency of applying the principle of balance to the requirements for bankruptcy applications in bankruptcy law of Indonesia. The problem formulations in this study are: first, what is the urgency of applying the principle of balance to the requirements for bankruptcy applications in bankruptcy law in Indonesia? Second, how is the concept of bankruptcy applications in bankruptcy law provision based on the principle of balance? The type of this research is normative research (legal review) using conceptual approach, comparative approach, and statute approach. The legal materials used in this research are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The conclusions of this study are: first, the legal protection contained in the provisions for bankruptcy applications in bankruptcy law in Indonesia is not based on the principle of balance. Second, to balance bankruptcy law norms, new provisions are needed such as minimum debt limit, insolvency test.

Keywords


Bankruptcy Application; Legal protection; The Principle of Balance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Anisah, Siti. (2008). Perlindungan Kepentingan Kreditor dan Debitor dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Total Media.

Aprita, Serlika. (2016). Penerapan Asas Keseimbangan Pada Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Tentang Pembatalan Perdamaian dalam PKPU (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Niaga No.. 01/Pembatalan Perdamaian/2006/JKT.PST. Makasar: Pena Indis.

Campbell, Dennis. (1992). International Corporate Insolvency Law. London: Butterworth & Co.

Fuady, Munir. (2017). Hukum Pailit dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harahap, M. Yahya. (1986). Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian, Bandung: Alumni.

Muljadi, Kartini dan Widjaja, Gunawan. (2014). Pedoman Menangani Perkara Ke-pailitan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Pesada.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. (2010). Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan. Cetakan Ke-IV. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Subhan, M. Hadi. (2015). Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Pengadilan. Cet. Ke 5. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia.

W. Collins, John. (1986). Business Law Text and Cases, New York: John Willey & Sons.

Jurnal

Diana Sujanto, “Urgensi Pengaturan Syarat Insolvensi Dalam Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang”, Acta Comitas, Vol. 3 No. 2, Oktober 2018.

Frederic Closset and Daniel Urban, “The balance of power between creditors and the firm: Evidence from German insolvency law”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Volume 58, (October 2019).

Hadi, I. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Konversi Sempadan Danau Limboto Menjadi Permukiman Bebas Di Kabupaten Gorontalo. Jurnal Al Himayah, 6 (1), 44-54.

Hotbonar Sinaga, “Proses Pembahasan RUU Kepailitan”, dalam Nina Noviana, “Perubahan Pokok dalam Peraturan Kepailitan Menurut Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang”, dalam http://jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/viewFile/301/233, diakses pada tanggal 27 Mei Pukul 23:08.

John C. McCoid II, “The Occasion for Invouluntary Bankruptcy”, American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Vol. 61 No.4, (Fall 1987).

Karen E. Blaney, “What Do You Mean My Partnership Has Been Petitioned into Bankrutpcy?”, Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 19 No. 3, (1992).

Klaus Kamlah, “The New German Isolvency Act: Insolvenzordnung”, The American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Vol. 70 No. 4, (Fall 1996).

M. Hadi Subhan, “Misuse of Bankruptcy Petitions by Creditors: The Case of Indonesia”, International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, Vol. 10 Issue 6, 2019.

Nancy A Petterman and Sherri Morissete, “Directors Duties in the Zone of Insolvency: The Quandary of the Non-Profit Corporation”, American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, Vol. 23 No. 12, (March 2004).

Richard H .W. Maloy, “Comparative Bankruptcy”, The Suffolk Transnational Review, Vol. 24 No. 1, Winter 2000.

Robert H. George, “Bankruptcy for Non-Bankruptcy Purpose: Are There Any Limits?”,The Review of Litigation, Vol. 6 No. 95, 1987.

Suslianto, S., & Hadi, I. (2022). PENERAPAN ASAS TIADA PIDANA TANPA KESALAHAN DALAM KETENTUAN PASAL 78 AYAT (15) UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 41 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG KEHUTANAN. At-Tanwir Law Review, 2(2), 162-172.

Ronald Saija, “Penyalagunaan Keadaan Dalam Prosedur Permohonan Pailit Di Pengadilan Niaga”, Adhaper, Vol. 1 No. 1, Januari 2015.

Ronald Saija, “Penyalagunaan Keadaan Dalam Prosedur Permohonan Pailit Di Pengadilan Niaga”, Jurnal SASI, No. 1 Vol. 24, Juni 2018.

Undang-Undang

Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang;

Undang-Undang No. 4 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan (PPSK).

Website

Insolvency Code of German of 7 May 2021, https://www.gestze-im-internet.de/englisch_inso/englisch_inso.html#p0193 , diakses pada tanggal 03 Mei 2023 Pukul 23:08.

“Petitioning for Bankruptcy”, https://business.gov.nl/regulation/bankruptcy/, diakses pada tanggal 5 Mei 2023 Pukul 20:17.


Article metrics

Abstract views : 129 | views : 80

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Hukum Egalitaire

Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo