PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS DALAM MEMBUAT AKTA PERNYATAAN KEPUTUSAN RAPAT ATAS RUPS FIKTIF (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 214/PDT.G/2021/PN.JKT.UTR)

 Muhammad Naufal Darmawan

Abstract


Notaries as public officials in making authentic deeds must implement the principle
of caution. Implementation of this principle must be carried out, especially in making
a deed of Statement of Meeting Decision (PKR) on changes to the management of a
PT. Nowadays, more and more notaries are being sued in court because the authentic
deeds they made turned out to be detrimental to the related party. In Decision Number
214/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Jkt.Utr, a notary was proven to have committed an unlawful
act (PMH) by making a PKR deed containing changes to the management of a PT
without first holding a General Meeting of Shareholders (RUPS). This study aims to
determine the principle of caution of notaries in making a deed of Statement of Meeting Decision on changes to the management of a PT in decision number
214/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Jkt.Utr and the form of notary accountability due to the making
of a PKR deed for a fictitious RUPS in decision number 214/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Jkt.Utr.
This type of research is normative legal research using library research. The results
of this study are that notaries are required to implement the principle of caution in
making PKR deeds for changes in PT management in the form of recognizing the
identities of the parties, ensuring the legal standing of the RUPS, and verifying supporting documents for making the deed. Notaries can be held civilly responsible by
the injured party, in this case the party whose position as the PT manager has been
replaced as a result of the issuance of a PKR deed regarding changes in the PT management, by filing a lawsuit for compensation due to the creation of a fictitious PKR deed.


Keywords


Accountability; Statement of Meeting Decision; Notary Public

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi, Jonathan, Biran Munandir, and Dan Thohir Luth. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 8, no. 1 (2017): 59.

Arsy, Eudea Adeli, Hanif Nur Widhiyanti, and Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Cacat Hukum Dan Tidak Sesuai Dengan Ketentuan Pembuatan Akta Dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 6, no. 1 (2021): 134–35. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.324.

Budi Untung. Kenotariatan Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2016.

Chairunnisa, Dheanda, Anggun Lestari Suryamizon, and Mahlil Adriaman. “Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Dalam Menjalankan Kewenangan.” Sakata Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2023): 63. https://www.jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/SLJ/article/view/4025.

Cornelius Simanjuntak, and Natalie Mulia. Organ Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.

Elza Syarief. Sengketa Antarorgan Perseroan: Perspektif Teori, Praktik, Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2020.

Hendra, M, Pratama Ginting, and Rica Gusmarani. “Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Melindungi Pihak Ketiga Terkait Dengan Pembuatan Akta Otentik.” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 8, no. 1 (2025): 693. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i1.6681.

M. Luthfan Hadi Darus. Hukum Notariat Dan Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Notaris. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2017.

Maulida, Rizky, Zainal Asikin, and Eduardus Bayo Sili. “Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Dalam Pembuatan Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Oleh Notaris.” Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan 4, no. 2 (2023): 832. https://doi.org/10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v4i2.179.

Mulyoto. Kriminalitas Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Perseroan Terbatas (PT). Yogyakarta: Cakrawala, 2021.

———. Legal Standing. Yogyakarta: Cakrawala, 2021.

Ridwan Khairandy. Hukum Kontrak Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2014.

———. Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2014.

Rostarum, Triamy. “Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Di Era Digital: Implementasi Dalam Mewujudkan Akta Yang Sempurna.” Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi 24, no. 3 (2024): 2305–6. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v24i3.5681.

Rudhi Prasetya. Perseroan Terbatas: Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.

Wahyuni, Sri. “Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Terkait Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidananya (Studi Kasus: Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Banten Nomor 9/PID/2019/PT.Btn).” Otentik’s: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 3, no. 2 (2021): 21.

Yuliani, Dwi, Suratman, and Sunardi. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Perubahan Pengurus Perseroan Yang Tidak Dihadiri Oleh Salah Satu Pengurus.” Jurnal Signifikan Humaniora, n.d., 11.


Article metrics

Abstract views : 171 | views : 257

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Hukum Egalitaire

Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo