PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ARBITRASE KOMERSIAL INTERNASIONAL (Studi Kasus Satelite Kementerian Pertahanan Vs Navayo International Ag)
Abstract
The refusal by the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia (Kemenhan) to comply with an international arbitral award in its dispute with Navayo International AG before the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in Singapore raises fundamental legal questions concerning the enforceability of foreign arbitral awards in Indonesia. Kemenhan invoked public policy exceptions and sovereign immunity over state assets to challenge enforcement. This case exemplifies the normative tension between Indonesia’s international obligations under the 1958 New York Convention and the domestic application of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Using a normative juridical approach, this study examines the scope and interpretation of the public policy exception by national courts, as well as its implications for legal certainty in cross-border commercial dispute resolution. The findings reveal a normative disharmony between statutory law and judicial practice, necessitating legal reform and enhanced institutional competence in international contracting among state entities.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buku, Makalah
Nugroho, Susanti Adi. 2015. Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase dan Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: Kencana.
Pryles, Michael & Michael J. Moser. 2007. Asian Leading Arbitrators' Guide to Interna-tional Arbitration. New York: JurisNet, LLC.
Subekti. 1987. Hukum Perjanjian, Jakarta: Intermasa.
Gautama, Sudargo. 1987. Pengantar Hukum Kontrak Internasional Indonesia. Ban-dung: Binacipta.
Adolf, Huala. 2008. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Kontrak Internasional. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Mutiara. Penolakan Putusan.
Frans Hendra, Enforcement.
Soekanto, Soerjono. 1986. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indone-sia Press.
Lubis, M. Solly. 1994. Filsafat Ilmu dan Penelitian. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2008. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Pradana Media Group.
E. Utrecht. 1959. Pengertian dalan Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Buku Ichtiar.
Hadi, Sutrisno. 2000. Metodologi Riset. Yogyakata: ANDI.
Arief Shidarta, Bernard. 2006. Moralitas Profesi Hukum Suatu Tawaran Kerangka Berpikir. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sefriani, Arbitrase Komersial dalam Hukum Internasional dan Hukum Nasional Indo-nesia, UII Press: Yogyakarta, 2018
Surakhmad, Winarto. 1978. Dasar Teknik Research. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sunggono, Bambang. 2002. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Per-sada.
Fajar, Mukti & Yulianto Achmad. 2012. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Purwanti, Ani. 2020. Metode Penelitian Hukum Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: CV. Jakad Media Publishing.
Sulistyo, A.D. Agung. Penolakan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional dalam Kasus Svitzer-Trada Kajian Putusan MA Nomor 169 K/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2017. Hukum Transnasional, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 1990 tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Asing
Konvensi New York 1958
Uncitral Model Law
Jurnal, Tesis, Skripsi
Mutiara Hikmah (2012), Penolakan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional dalam Kasus As-tro All Asia Network PLC, "Jurnal Yudisial" Vol. 5 No. 1, 64-83.
Frans Hendra Winarta (2017), Enforcement of International Arbitration Award in Arbi-tration Practice in Indonesia, "Indonesia Arbitration Quarterly Newsletter", Vol. 9, No. 4. 1-26.
Mosgan Situmorang, Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, vol 20, No.4(2020):580
Rachel Yovani Adriani Napitupulu, dalam tesis “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Arbitrase Internasional yang DIbatalkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat”, Magister Kenotariatan FH USU.
Hannu Honka (1996), Harmonization of Contract Law through International Trade: A Nordic Perspective, "Tulane European & Civil Law Forum", Vol. 11, 111-184.
Junandar Indra Tongam Panggabean dkk., 2015, Analisis Yuridis Penolakan Ekseku-si Putusan Arbitrase Internasional, USU Law Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 Novem-ber 2015.
Napitupulu, “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Arbitrase Internasional yang DIbatal-kan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat”, Magister Kenotariatan FH USU.
Tutojo. 2015. Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Dalam Sistem Hukum Indone-sia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Volume 9 Nomor 1 Mei - Oktober 2015 ISSN. 1411-8564.
Armelia Safira, dalam skripsi “Penolakan Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitase Dagang Inter-nasional oleh Suatu Negara Ditinjau Dari Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Sarjana FH Universitas Hassanudin.
Internet
HukumOnline, 21 April 2015, Pengadilan Tak Bisa Batalkan Putusan Arbitrase Inter-nasional, http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt553641aea376d/pengadilan-tak-bisabatalkan-putusan-arbitrase-internasional
https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/waspadai-dua-pasal-penghambat-kepastian-hukum-arbitrase-di-indonesia-lt5d88842351fce/?page=3
https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/memahami-pelaksanaan-putusan-arbitrase-indonesia-dan-singapura-lt60dc48f4c8d8a/?page=3
https://money.kompas.com/read/2021/12/02/183154026/membaca-peluang-penyelesaian-arbitrase-internasional-di-indonesia?page=all
https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/id/uncitral-expedited-arbitration-rules/
https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Kerthanegara/article/view/21932/14552
https://lk2fhui.law.ui.ac.id/ketertiban-umum-sebagai-dasar-penolakan-eksekusi-putusan-arbitrase-asing-di-indonesia/
Article metrics
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Hukum Egalitaire
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo



