TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS ATAS PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK TERKAIT DENGAN PEMALSUAN AKTA OTENTIK

 M. Dandi Akbar

Abstract


This study aims to investigate the violation of the code of ethics of a notary who forges official documents. By using normative research methods, it can be concluded that a notary is a profession appointed by the government to make official deeds that have been regulated by law, notaries also have authority regarding agreements. Deeds made by a notary must meet the provisions in order to be considered or referred to as deeds that have an official nature. If the process of preparing the official deed is not structured or does not meet the requirements, then the deed can be canceled according to law. However, there are still many notaries who are involved in fraud and negligence related to the profession they are pursuing. The government and related institutions need to collaborate to raise awareness of the importance of protecting legal documents and implementing appropriate steps to deal with forgery of official deeds. This study aims to investigate the violation of the code of ethics of a notary who forges official documents. By using normative research methods, it can be concluded that a notary is a profession appointed by the government to make official deeds that have been regulated by law, notaries also have authority regarding agreements. Deeds made by a notary must meet the provisions in order to be considered or referred to as deeds that have an official nature. If the process of preparing the official deed is not structured or does not meet the requirements, then the deed can be canceled according to law. However, there are still many notaries who are involved in fraud and negligence related to the profession they are pursuing. The government and related institutions need to collaborate to raise awareness of the importance of protecting legal documents and implementing appropriate steps to deal with forgery of official deeds.

Keywords


Legal Certainty; Artificial Intelligenc; Regulations

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bams. (2023). Kode Etik: Pengertian, Tujuan, dan Prinsip. Bams Education.

Fuady, M. (2013). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pendekatan Kontemporer., Bandung.

Hermawati, R. (2020). Pemalsuan Akta Autentik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1003 K/PID/2015). Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 164.

Humas. (2021). Koordinasi Penguatan Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Terhadap Jabatan Notaris dan Launching Aplikasi Pembayaran Pendaftaran Fidusia. Bali: Portal.

Kenotariatan, M. (2022). Perlunya Penguatan Kode Etik Notaris Dalam Pelaksanaan Jabatannya.

Kumparan, P. (2022). Bunyi Pasal 263 KUHP tentang Pemalsuan Dokumen. Berita Terk.

Latifah. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris. Offi-cum Notarium, 144-154.

Maimunah Nurlete, W. W. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Palsu Ber-dasarkan Jenis Norma Dan Sanksinya. Indonesia Notary, 24.

MKRI. (2020). Dianggap Rugikan Jaksa dan Publik, UU Jabatan Notaris Diuji” . Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indoensia.

Purwaningsih, I. (2019). Pemalsuan Akta Autentik Yang Melibatkan Notaris. Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan, 4.

Putri, C. C. (2021). Peningkatan Pemahaman Masyarakat Melalui Sosialisasi. Dedikasi Hukum, 100-110.

Sundani, T. (2017). ANALISIS HUKUM ATAS PENGGUNAAN DAN PEMBUATAN AKTA NOTARIS SECARA ELEKTRONIK . Premise Law Jurnal, 20.

Zein, A. A. (2022). Penerapan Cyber Notary Dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik Menurut Undang – Undang Jabatan Notaris. Akta Notaris, 11


Article metrics

Abstract views : 199 | views : 134

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Hukum Egalitaire

Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo