⚠️ Pemberitahuan: Website Journal UMGO akan melakukan pemeliharaan (maintenance) dari tanggal 7-14 Oktober 2026. Mohon pastikan pekerjaan Anda tersimpan.

Understanding the Complexities of Contemporary Sunni-Shia Relations and Their Prospects Post-Beijing Reconciliation 2023

 ahmad indri astanto, Nurwahidin Nurwahidin

Abstract


The relationship between Sunni and Shia communities in the Islamic world has long been a global concern due to its historical, cultural, and political complexities. The purpose of this study is to classify the complexity of contemporary relations between Sunnis and Shias. Furthermore, this study is expected to describe the prospects for Sunni-Shia relations after the Beijing reconciliation agreement. The content analysis research method was chosen based on the instrument used by the researcher, namely the literature on Sunni and Shia developments. The results show that Sunnis, who mostly live in Saudi Arabia, and Shias, who mostly live in Iran, have different perspectives on religious understanding, especially regarding life principles. Shias are known as fanatical worshipers of Muhammad's grandson (Husain) and believe that only his descendants are worthy of becoming the next caliph. Meanwhile, Sunnis believe that the caliph can be chosen through consensus. This difference has become a conflict over the years and has developed into a conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran. Relations between the two can be strengthened in the Middle East if the Beijing reconciliation agreement is implemented and adhered to together for the advancement of the Arabian Peninsula in the eyes of the world.


Keywords


Sunni; Shia; Beijing Reconciliation; Complexities

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aalen, O., Borgan, O., & Gjessing, H. (2008). Survival and event history analysis: a process point of view. Springer Science & Business Media.

Abdo, G. (2017). The new sectarianism: The Arab uprisings and the rebirth of the Shi'a-Sunni divide. Oxford University Press.

Abdullah, A. F., & Syakur, S. (2023). Melacak Akar Permasalahan Hubungan Antara Sunni dan Syi’ah. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial, 1(4), 560-567.

Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). An e-learning theoretical framework. An e-learning theoretical framework, (1), 292-307

Ardovini, “Competing Islams: Religious legitimacy and the foreign policies of Saudi Arabia and Iran,” in Saudi Arabia and Iran, Manchester University Press, 2022, pp. 55–73.

Bain, J. (2013). Category-theoretic structure and radical ontic structural realism. Synthese, 190, 1621-1635

Blossfeld, H. P., Hamerle, A., & Mayer, K. U. (2014). Event history analysis: Statistical theory and application in the social sciences. Psychology Press.

Cipta, S. E., Kanumoyoso, B., & Darmawan, W. (2021). Dinamika Konflik Bersenjata Sektarian Sunni–Syiah Lebanon Utara (2011-2015): The Dinamic of The Sunni-Syiah Armed Conflict in The North Lebanon (2011-2015). Insyirah: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Arab dan Studi Islam, 4(2), 134-146.

Confino, A. (1997). Collective memory and cultural history: Problems of method. The American historical review, 102(5), 1386-1403.

Edi, D., Betshani, S., Prof, J., Suria, D., & No, S. (2009). Analisis Data dengan Menggunakan ERD dan Model Konseptual Data Warehouse. Jurnal informatika, 5(1), 71-85.

Feagin, J. R., Orum, A. M., & Sjoberg, G. (Eds.). (2016). A case for the case study. UNC Press Books.

Finnbogason, D., Larsson, G., & Svensson, I. (2019). Is Shia-Sunni violence on the rise? Exploring new data on intra-Muslim organised violence 1989-2017. Civil Wars, 21(1), 25-53.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case study. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4, 301-316.

Gonzalez, N. (2013). The Sunni-Shia conflict: understanding sectarian violence in the Middle East. Nortia Media Ltd.

Gul, R. K. Abbasi, and S. A. Haider, “Iran and Saudi Arabia’s strategic rivalry and the Middle Eastern security: An assessment,” Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 17–29, 2021.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). What is a theoretical framework? A practical answer. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(7), 593-597

Miichi and Y. Kayane, “The Politics of Religious Pluralism in Indonesia: The Shi’a Response to the Sampang Incidents of 2011–12,” TRaNS: Trans-Regional and-National Studies of Southeast Asia, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 51–64, 2020.

Minhajuddin and A. K. Umam, “Implikasi Normalisasi Hubungan Diplomatik Negara-Negara Timur Tengah dengan Israel terhadap Prospek Kemerdekaan Palestina: Telaah Konstruktivisme,”

Intermestic: Journal of International Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 184–208, 2023.

Nawaz, A. Amin, and M. F. Ashgar, “Iran-Saudi Arabia Rapprochement: A Perspective of Neoclassical Realism,” Global International Relations Review, VI, 2023.

Shikoh, “Kerbala: The Divine Interdisciplinary Cognisance of Imam

Husayn (as).,” Al-Ameed Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, 2019.

Tukur, W. Lawal, and Y. A. Manu, “The Saudi-Iran Diplomatic Face-Off And Its Security Implications On The Middle-East,” Hallmark University, p. 34, 2021.

Winter and Y. Guzansky, “Islam in the Service of Peace: Religious Aspects of the Abraham Accord.” JSTOR, 2020.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31314/pjia.13.1.30-39.2024

Article metrics

Abstract views : 165 | views : 795

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web
Analytics View Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) Stats
 
Creative Commons License

Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.