Determinants of Public Service Satisfaction in Smart Governance: The Roles of Transparency, Collaboration, Participation, and Accountability

 Nur Afifah, Simson Ginting

Abstract


The development of information and communication technologies (ICT) has brought changes not only to industrial sectors but also to public services, promising efficiency and effectiveness in their implementation. Entering 2025, Indonesia is at a crucial point in digital transformation, with an estimated 67.66% of the population living in urban areas, creating an urgent need for infrastructure and public services. Smart governance, as a bureaucratic reform, emphasizes the importance of adopting digital technology to streamline public services and ensure transparency for users. This study addresses this gap by investigating the impact of smart governance on public satisfaction, offering novelty through an integrated empirical assessment of these three specific dimensions within Indonesia's digital bureaucracy framework. A descriptive quantitative approach was adopted to provide an objective, scalable measurement of citizen perceptions. Primary data were collected via structured questionnaires distributed to 324 respondents selected to ensure adequate statistical power for complex variable modeling. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling with Analysis of Moment Structures (SEM-AMOS), preceded by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to validate the measurement model's construct reliability and convergent validity before evaluating structural paths. In alignment with standard reporting guidelines, tabular and graphical models were structured to present standardized path coefficients and fit indices clearly. The results demonstrate that all three constructs exert a statistically significant positive influence on public satisfaction. Accountability emerged as the strongest predictor (CR = 6.426), followed by transparency (CR = 3.821) and collaboration (CR = 3.475), all significantly exceeding the critical threshold of 1.96. In conclusion, these findings confirm that while transparent and collaborative channels enhance public engagement, robust administrative accountability is the primary driver of citizen satisfaction in smart city governance. Policymakers must prioritize anti-corruption mechanisms and real-time service tracking alongside digital interface rollouts to maximize public trust.

Keywords


Smart Governance; Public Service; Transparency; Accountability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anto‎, Mappasere, F. A., Abdi‎, & Alyas‎. (2025). The Role of E-government in Improving Efficiency and Transparency in Public Services in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 10(16), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i16.19157

Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing E-Democracy Back In. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303256372

Desouza, K. C., Kapucu, N., & Wu, J. (2021). Special Issue: Smart governance in the contemporary era. In Journal of Urban Affairs (Vol. 43, Number 4, p. 503). Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1909903

Ercan, T., & Kutay, M. (2021). Smart cities critical infrastructure recommendations and solutions. In Solving Urban Infrastructure Problems Using Smart City Technologies (pp. 503–541). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816816-5.00024-3

Herdiyanti, A., Hapsari, P. S., & Susanto, T. D. (2019). Modelling the smart governance performance to support smart city program in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.135

Hsu, H.-Y. (2025). Operational transparency and satisfaction with public services. Public Management Review, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2507953

Kaiser, Z. R. M. A. (2024). Smart governance for smart cities and nations. Journal of Economy and Technology, 2, 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ject.2024.07.003

Lindquist, E. A., & Huse, I. (2017). Accountability and monitoring government in the digital era: Promise, realism and research for digital‐era governance. Canadian Public Administration, 60(4), 627–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12243

Lisdawati, L., Paselle, E., Indarto, K., & Irawan, B. (2025). Implementation of Smart City Program Policy on The Use of Samagov Application in Digital Sub-District of Samarinda Seberang. Buletin Poltanesa, 26(1), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.51967/tanesa.v26i1.3389

Liu, S. M., & Yuan, Q. (2015). The Evolution of Information and Communication Technology in Public Administration. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1717

Manenji, T., & Marufu, B. (2016). The impact of adopting e-government as a mechanism to enhance accountability as well as transparent conduct within public institutions. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance ISSN 2394-3351, 3(7), 84. https://doi.org/10.19085/journal.sijbpg030701

Milakovich, M. E. (2012). Digital Governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203815991

Minarni, S. (2025). The Effect of Public Transparency, Competence The Quality of Public Services, and Customer Satisfaction Mediated by Apparatus Performance. Architecture Image Studies, 6(4), 1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.62754/ais.v6i4.736

Mutiara, D., Yuniarti, S., & Pratama, B. (2018). Smart governance for smart city. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 126(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012073

Nastjuk, I., Trang, S., & Papageorgiou, E. I. (2022). Smart cities and smart governance models for future cities: Current research and future directions. In Electronic Markets (Vol. 32, Number 4, pp. 1917–1924). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00609-0

Neumann, O., Matt, C., Hitz-Gamper, B. S., Schmidthuber, L., & Stürmer, M. (2019). Joining forces for public value creation? Exploring collaborative innovation in smart city initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101411

Nur Soulthoni, H. P., & Itasari, M. (2025). The Implementation of Electronic-Based Archiving to Accelerate Government Digitalization in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS), 5(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijias.v5i1.1735

radikaPandey, J. K. (2023). Public trust and collaborative e-governance performance: a study on government institutions and services. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(4), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2023-0113

Pandey, J. K. (2024). Evaluating public service value within collaborative e-governance: a study in the Indian context. Digital Transformation and Society, 3(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTS-08-2023-0065

Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2011). The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311399230

Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018a). Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review. In Information Polity (Vol. 23, Number 2, pp. 143–162). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170067

Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018b). Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review. Information Polity, 23(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170067

Puspitasari, L., & Ishii, K. (2016). Digital divides and mobile Internet in Indonesia: Impact of smartphones. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 472–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.11.001

Radika, P., Rachmawati, R., & Rijanta, R. (2025). Analysing smart governance in public service delivery: evidence from 61 smart cities in Indonesia. Human Geographies, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.5719/hgeo.2025.192.5

Scholl, H. J. (2006). Electronic government: information management capacity, organizational capabilities, and the sourcing mix. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.002

Shabnam Sharmin, & Rakibul Hasan Chowdhury. (2025). Digital Transformation in Governance: The Impact of e-governance on Public Administration and Transparency. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(1), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2025.7.1.27

Silva, N. S. e, Castro, R., & Ferrão, P. (2025). Smart Grids in the Context of Smart Cities: A Literature Review and Gap Analysis. Energies, 18(5), 1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051186

Soomro, K., Bhutta, M. N. M., Khan, Z., & Tahir, M. A. (2019). Smart city big data analytics: An advanced review. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1319

Sulistyaningsih, T., Purnama, R. A., & Kulsum, U. (2023). Smart City Policy: Strategy and Implementation to Realize Smart Urban Governance in Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 10(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v10i1.13840

Tan, S. Y., & Taeihagh, A. (2020). Smart city governance in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030899

Tresiana, N., Duadji, N., & Jayamuna, I. M. (2024). Building Agility and Adaptive Governance Through Digital Bureaucracy Ecosystem for Innovative Public Policy. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 21(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v21i2.1186

Triyanto, D., Kismartini, Purnaweni, H., & Luqman, Y. (2025). The Impact of Smart Governance Implementation on Sustainable Development Goals in Indonesia. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(3), e04592. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n03.pe04592

Viale Pereira, G., Cunha, M. A., Lampoltshammer, T. J., Parycek, P., & Testa, M. G. (2017). Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: a cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Information Technology for Development, 23(3), 526–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946

Volkery, A., & Ribeiro, T. (2009). Scenario planning in public policy: Understanding use, impacts, and the role of institutional context factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(9), 1198–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.009

Wong, W., & Welch, E. (2004). Does E‐Government Promote Accountability? A Comparative Analysis of Website Openness and Government Accountability. Governance, 17(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00246.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31314/pjia.15.1.348-362.2026

Article metrics

Abstract views : 0 | views : 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web Analytics View Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) Stats
 
Creative Commons License

Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.