Evaluation of the Maggot Cultivation Labour Intensive Program Using the CIPP Model

 Aisya Septia Cahyaning Puteri, Susi Hardjati

Abstract


Poverty remains a major socioeconomic challenge in Indonesia, requiring effective and sustainable intervention programs. One initiative implemented by the Surabaya City Government is the Maggot Cultivation Labour Intensive Program, designed to generate employment opportunities while supporting community-based economic empowerment. This study evaluates the implementation of the program in Krembangan District using the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) evaluation model. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed through interviews, observations, and document analysis involving program stakeholders and beneficiaries. The findings indicate that, from the context perspective, the program addresses local needs in areas characterized by relatively high unemployment and poverty. However, the input evaluation reveals limited community participation, inadequate facilities and infrastructure, and insufficient availability of raw materials. Process evaluation identifies weaknesses in stakeholder coordination, inconsistent monitoring, and technical implementation that has not yet achieved expected production targets. Product evaluation demonstrates that the program has not significantly improved participants' income or economic independence, while diversification of business outcomes remains limited. Overall, although the program shows relevance as a poverty reduction strategy, its effectiveness is constrained by institutional, technical, and participatory challenges. Strengthening stakeholder collaboration, improving resource provision, enhancing capacity-building activities, and establishing more consistent monitoring mechanisms are recommended to increase program sustainability and maximize its contribution to local poverty alleviation.

Keywords


CIPP Model; Labour Intensive; Maggot Cultivation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Annisa,P., Sunarmi,S., Sobri,A. (2023). Evaluation of Teaching Campus Programs with Models Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP). JAMP: Journal of Educational Administration and Management, 6(3), 247–262.

Central Statistics Agency. (2021). Percentage of Poor Population September 2021 . https://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2022/01/17/1929/persentase-penduduk-miskin-september-2021-turun-menjadi-9-71-persen.htmlhttps://www.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2022/01/17/1929/persentase-penduduk

Creswell, J. (2018). Qualitative Research & Research Design. Choosing between Five Approaches. Ahmad Lintang Lazuardi's translation. Yogyakarta: Student Library.

Dr. Eny Winaryati, M. P. (2021). Evaluation Models, Applications And Combinations. Bandung: KBM INDONESIA.

Dr. Fatmawati, M. A. & Ade. Sofyan. M. M. A. (2022). Analysis of Poverty Problems and Social Policy. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Izzah, Z., & Hertati, D. (2024). Implementation of the Labor-Intense Program in Reducing Unemployment in the City of Surabaya: An Analysis Based on David C's Model. Corten. NeoRespublica : Journal of Government Science, 6(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.52423/neores.v6i1.316

Kamil, M. G. & Artiningsih. A. (2024). Evaluation of Poverty Alleviation Policies in Suruh District, Semarang Regency. PWK Engineering (City Area Planning), 13(1).

Mahendra, D. A. . & Rahayu. T. (2024). Implementation of labor-intensive programs in Krembangan District, Surabaya City. Journal of Public Sector Innovation, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.38156/jisp.v4i2.253

Surabaya Mayor Regulation Number 83 of 2023 concerning Labor Intensive Programs in the City of Surabaya.

Rama, A., Ambiyar, A., Rizal, F., Jalinus, N., Waskito, W., & Wulansari, R. E. (2023). Concept of Context, Input, Process and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) in Vocational High Schools. JRTI (Indonesian Action Research Journal), 8(1), 82.

Setiawan, M. Y. A. . & Megawati. S. (2022). Evaluation of Cash Solid Work Policies in Pekarungan Village, Sukodono District, Sidoarjo Regency. Publica, 665–680.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31314/pjia.15.1.87-96.2026

Article metrics

Abstract views : 38 | views : 18

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web
Analytics View Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) Stats
 
Creative Commons License

Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.