Ontology of Literacy in the Workplace: A Phenomenological Perspective
Abstract
This study explores the ontological essence of workplace literacy through a phenomenological lens, addressing the evolving demands of modern professional environments that require advanced competencies in literacy, numeracy, and critical thinking. Grounded in the recognition that contemporary workplaces are increasingly complex and text-mediated, this research investigates how reading, writing, and communication practices are enacted, experienced, and interpreted by employees across various sectors in Indonesia. Employing transcendental phenomenology as the methodological framework, the study systematically analyzes both the textural descriptions and structural essences of informants' lived experiences from diverse workplace settings. This dual analysis reveals that literacy exists and manifests within professional contexts as more than just a technical skill. The findings demonstrate that workplace literacy operates simultaneously as a functional competency and as a form of professional consciousness that mediates relationships among individuals, texts, and organizational systems. Literacy emerges as essential for maintaining work consistency, enabling critical self-reflection, and bridging personal values with organizational culture. Furthermore, the study reveals that authentic workplace literacy is deeply rooted in reflective awareness and humanistic values, rather than being confined to instrumental or procedural applications. These insights underscore the necessity of cultivating workplace literacy development programs that prioritize reflexive practice, critical consciousness, and the integration of human-centered values within organizational learning frameworks, ultimately contributing to more meaningful and effective professional communication practices.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, F., Widén, G., & Huvila, I. (2020). The impact of workplace information literacy on organizational innovation: An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102041
Ahmadi Anas. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Sastra: Perspektif Monodisipliner dan Interdisipliner. Penerbit Graniti.
Ahmadi, A., & Yulianto, B. (2017). Descriptive-Analytical Studies of Literacy Movement in Indonesia, 2003. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 4(3).
Ahmadi, A., Sodiq, S., Setiawan, S., Pratiwi, Y., & Hariyati, N. R. (2019). Learning writing through psychowriting perspective. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.1p.4
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (n.d.). Literasi. In Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) daring [Online dictionary]. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. Retrieved October 10, 2025, at 15:46 WIB, from https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/literasi
Barakat, B. (2016). Improving Adult Literacy Without Improving The Literacy of Adults? A Cross-National Cohort Analysis. World Development, 87, 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.06.015
Bintoro, R. W., Dzuhaidah, N. D., Maryono, A. S., Sanyoto, S., & Kupita, W. (2022). Ontological Study of The Classification of People in The Transfer of Land Rights in Realizing Legal Certainty. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.34806
Blunch, N.-H. (2017). Adult literacy programs in developing countries. IZA World of Labor. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.374
Cetindamar, D., Kitto, K., Wu, M., Zhang, Y., Abedin, B., & Knight, S. (2024). Explicating AI Literacy of Employees at Digital Workplaces. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3138503
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In SAGE Publications, Inc. SAGE.
Creswell, John. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design (4th ed.). SAGE.
Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo (3, Ed.). SAGE.
Jagannathan, S., & Geronimo, D. (2021). Reaping the Benefits of Industry 4.0 through Skills Development in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.22617/SPR200327
Jurmo, P. (2004). Focus on Basics_Workplace Literacy Education: Definitions, Purposes, and Approaches.
Killian, M. R., Chitiyo, G., Kolodziej, N. J., & Akenson, A. (2021). Examining the Underlying Structure of Adult Literacy Practices at Home and at Work. Reading Horizons, 60(2).
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Method. Sage Publications.
Nikou, S., de Reuver, M., & Mahboob Kanafi, M. (2022). Workplace literacy skills—how information and digital literacy affect adoption of digital technology. Journal of Documentation, 78(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2021-0241
OECD. (2024). Adult skills and productivity: New evidence from PIAAC 2023.
OECD. (2024). Do Adults Have the Skills They Need to Thrive in a Changing World? (OECD Skills Studies).
Saadia, H., & Naveed, M. A. (2023). Effect of information literacy on lifelong learning, creativity, and work performance among journalists. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR
Schroeder, M. J. (2014). Ontological study of information: Identity and state. Kybernetes, 43(6), 882–894. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2013-0115
Šobota, D. (2023). Critical workplace information literacy: Laying the groundwork for a new construct. Journal of Information Literacy, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.11645/17.1.3353
Sukardi Kodrat, D., Tambunan, D. B., & Hartono, W. (2024). Investigation of workplace literacy in Indonesia to enhance employability opportunities. Decision Science Letters, 13, 351–362. https://doi.org/10.5267/dsl.2024.2.002
Trilling, B., & Fadil, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times (1st ed.). Jossey Bass.
WEF. (2025). The Future of Job Report 2025. www.weforum.org
Widén, G., Ahmad, F., Nikou, S., Ryan, B., & Cruickshank, P. (2021). Workplace information literacy: Measures and methodological challenges. Journal of Information Literacy, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.11645/15.2.2812
Article metrics
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








