Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Kesetaraan Paket A Bagi Anak Putus Sekolah di Kabupaten Gorontalo

Lia Nurhayati, Srihandayani Suprapto

Abstract


This study aims to evaluate the Paket A equivalency education program for school dropouts in Gorontalo District. This program evaluation research uses descriptive method with the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, and Product). The data analysis in this study was carried out in a qualitative descriptive manner, then the qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis, namely comparing the data at each stage of the CIPP then concluding. In this thematic analysis, an analysis flow is adopted which consists of data collection, data presentation, data reduction and conclusion verification. The results showed that the implementation of the Paket A equivalency education program in Gorontalo District has been optimal. This is based on the objective standard criteria that have been set in this evaluation study. The length of learning for the Paket A Equivalent Education program for each class or class is adjusted to the curriculum structure above. The learning process includes academic learning, namely the efforts made by the tutor to provide insight and knowledge to learning citizens facilitated by the tutor.

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi program pendidikan kesetaraan paket A bagi anak putus sekolah di Kabupaten Gorontalo. Penelitian evaluasi program ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dengan model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, dan Product). Analisis data dalam penelitian ini dilaksanakan secara deskriptif kualitatif, kemudian data kualitatif dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik yaitu membandingkan data pada setiap tahapan CIPP kemudian disimpulkan. Dalam analisis tematik ini, ditempuh alur analisis yang terdiri atas pengumpulan data, penyajian data, reduksi data dan kesimpulan verifikasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sudah optimalnya pelaksanaan program pendidikan kesetaraan paket A di Kabupaten Gorontalo, Hal ini berdasarkan pada kriteria standar objektif yang telah ditetapkan dalam penelitian evaluasi ini.  Lama pembelajaran program Pendidikan Kesetaraan Paket A untuk setiap angkatan atau kelas disesuaikan dengan struktur kurikulum diatas. Proses pembelajaran meliputi pembelajaran akademik, yaitu upaya yang dilakukan tutor untuk memberikan wawasan dan ilmu pengetahuan kepada warga belajar yang difasilitasi oleh tutor.

 

 


Keywords


Evaluasi; Program; Pendidikan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbar, M. F., & Mohi, W. K. (2018). Studi Evaluasi Kebijakan (Evaluasi Beberapa Kebijakan di Indonesia). Gorontalo: Ideas Publishing.

Amir, A. (2020). Public Policy Implementation: Study on Educational Budgeting of Palopo. Journal La Sociale, 1(1), 5-11.

Congdon, P. J., & MeQueen, J. (2000). The stability of rater severity in large‐scale assessment programs. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37(2), 163-178.

DuBois, D. L., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J. E., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(2), 57-91.

Kaplan, B., & Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems. In Evaluating the organizational impact of healthcare information systems (pp. 30-55). Springer, New York, NY.

Lyons, A. C., Palmer, L., Jayaratne, K. S., & Scherpf, E. (2006). Are we making the grade? A national overview of financial education and program evaluation. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 40(2), 208-235.

Norbutaevich, J. T. (2020). Use of Digital Learning Technologies in Education on the Example of Smart Education. Journal La Edusci, 1(3), 33-37.

Oktriawan, W. (2017). Pengaruh tingkat upah dan tingkat pendidikan terhadap produktivitas tenaga kerja: studi kasus tenaga kerja indutri garment di kabupaten Purwakarta (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung).

Riniwati, H. (2016). Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia: Aktivitas Utama dan Pengembangan SDM. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Schatt, A., Doukakis, L., Bessieux-Ollier, C., & Walliser, E. (2016). Do goodwill impairments by European firms provide useful information to investors?. Accounting in Europe, 13(3), 307-327.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. ERIC.

Watkins, R., West Meiers, M., & Visser, Y. (2012). A guide to assessing needs: Essential tools for collecting information, making decisions, and achieving development results. The World Bank.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31314/pjia.9.2.168-175.2020

Article metrics

Abstract views : 109 | views : 37

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web
Analytics View Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) Stats
 
Creative Commons License

Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.